摘要
本文汇集了“南风研究所”（Südwind Institute）高级研究员弗里德尔·胡茨-亚当斯（Friedel Hütz-Adams）以及里科尔托国际组织（Rikolto International）可可与咖啡全球项目主任阿卜杜拉希·阿里尤（Abdulahi Aliyu）的专家见解。
Jointly commissioned by Evidensia, The Living Income Community of Practice (LICOP), and ISEAL Alliance, this report examines three in-depth case studies to examine how prominent living income policy initiatives have evolved, what motivated key actors to support or resist them, and what practitioners can draw from these experiences to apply in their own work. It also proposes an analytical framework that researchers can use to construct comparable cases.
There is more than one way to work towards a living income and each case study has been carefully chosen to represent a different ‘type’ of living income strategy that sectors and governments can play a key role in. The case studies are:
- The Living Income Differential in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana
- The integration of living income into the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
- Vietnam’s decades-long national coffee sector strategy and why its smallholders now earn relatively high incomes
该报告还包含两篇深度报道，分别聚焦于国际咖啡组织主办的“咖啡公私合作工作组”，以及Rikolto在西非、东非、拉丁美洲和东南亚地区为推动实现体面收入所开展的实地工作。